Independent scholar, cat addict, tattoo lover

Floor onderzoekt

Veel mensen hebben een onderzoekende geest zonder het te beseffen. Ze stellen vragen, analyseren, interpreteren en trekken conclusies; maar ‘onderzoek’ vinden ze het niet, want wat weten ze nu van theorie? ‘Onderzoek’ lijkt zo het domein van de universiteit. De wetenschap is echter groter dan dat. En de complexiteit van ons bestaan vraagt om meer onderzoekende geesten, die kritisch zijn en in researching publics samen betekenis geven aan wat er gebeurt of kan gebeuren.

Ik heb van mijn achttiende tot mijn tweeëndertigste in de universitaire wereld rondgelopen, eerst als student en daarna als niet-wetenschappelijk medewerker, buitenpromovendus en post-doc onderzoeker. Tijdens deze wandel deed ik Franse taal- en Letterkunde, Sociale Wetenschappen, Informatica, Bedrijfswetenschappen en Sociale Pedagogiek aan.

Since decades, outsiders criticize The Ivory Tower for its seclusion. Today, insiders proclaim a crisis within the tower itself. Staff publicly criticize conditions for research and teaching. Here I reflect as on my experiences as an action researcher within academia and address the question of espoused theories and theories-in-use in academic practice. My starting point is the case of an academic business school that was renowned for successful educational innovations. I wondered its success could be explained by the organizational theories of its staff.

In this article I address two interrelated questions. The first question is, what role do external PhD. candidates play in the emergence of paradigms? The second question is, if anything, what do external PhD. candidates actually contribute to the process of emerging paradigms? In order to answer these questions, I conducted an exploratory study into the vicissitudes of external PhD. candidates in the Netherlands. As my findings suggest, they display a fully-fledged academic habitus.

Microstructures are networks that aim to solve persistent social problems in rural or urban areas. These are transdisciplinary networks of inhabitants, entrepreneurs, professionals, and academics who bind their forces to realize an ambition they share in the area concerned. They require small investments in governance which we expect to result in social entrepreneurship and self organisation.

How to explain an academic community that theorises about knowledge intensive organisations whilst creating practical knowledge about living in this community that negates these theories? I constructed a learning history of an academic business school and found some answers. Confronting the collective narrative of the organisation about itself with analyses and recommendations written for others, I found little correspondence between the two. To find out why, I deconstructed the organisational narrative and searched for dominant metaphors that guided everyday practice.

The learning history is designed to describe the coming about of best practices, with their reproduction in mind. In this paper, I discuss the implications of this instrument and present a modified version. I use a so-called discursive learning history to zoom in on the interaction between a convergent, official, organisational narrative on the one hand, and people acting according to their own stories on the other. Narrative structures help to create an inner logic that help people to make sense of their organisation.

Pagina's